Detailed Record



Microbiome analyses of poultry feeds: Part II. Comparison of different poultry feeds


Abstract Within the realm of poultry feed mill operations, the persistent concern over microbial feed quality necessitates the establishment of a robust baseline for enhancing and sustaining the standards of commercial feeds. This dual-phase investigation, comprising Parts I, was previously published, and the current study presented here as Part II aimed to illuminate this baseline using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. In Part II, nine distinct commercial poultry feeds formulated as starters, growers, starter/growers, or supplements, the selected feeds underwent genomic DNA extraction, amplification with custom dual-indexed primers, and subsequent Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Through data analysis in QIIME2-2021.4 and R Studio, the study unveils alpha (Kruskal–Wallis) and beta (ANOSIM) diversity, taxonomic differences (ANCOM), and core microbiomes (core_members), deeming main and pairwise effects statistically significant at p < 0.05 and Q < 0.05. Notably, the investigation identified 30% common core microbial members across the nine feed types, shedding light on potential foodborne poultry pathogens such as Helicobacter and Campylobacter. Probiotic-associated feeds exhibited distinct microbial communities, emphasizing the need to explore their impact on the early poultry gastrointestinal tract (GIT) further.
Authors E. G. Olson , Dana K. Dittoe University of WyomingORCID , Andrew Micciche , David A. Stock , Peter M. Rubinelli , Michael J. Rothrock ORCID , Steven C. Ricke ORCID
Journal Info Taylor & Francis | Journal of Environmental Science and Health , pages: 1 - 9
Publication Date 6/5/2024
ISSN 0360-1234
TypeKeyword Image article
Open Access closed Closed Access
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2361596
KeywordsKeyword Image Obesity-associated Microbiome (Score: 0.524401)