Detailed Record



Respecting Conversational Norms Improves Reception of Expert Messages Among Unvaccinated Individuals


Abstract The association of medical experts with politically left-leaning cities and states early in the COVID-19 pandemic may have exacerbated vaccine hesitancy in right-leaning states of the US. Criticism from outside experts violates rules of communication between social groups (i.e. an intergroup sensitivity effect), leading to rejection of messages promoting vaccine safety and efficacy. In two studies, we document the effects of shared geographical group membership for medical expert messages promoting vaccination. We also found evidence that satisfying conversational norms against intergroup criticism reduces message rejection. Specifically, an invitation from ingroup political elites for a doctor to speak reduced the negative effects of unshared group identity.
Authors Sean M. McCrea University of WyomingORCID , J. Lukas Thürmer ORCID , Matthew R. Helm University of Wyoming , C. J. Erion University of Wyoming , Kem P. Krueger University of Wyoming
Journal Info Taylor & Francis | Health Communication , pages: 1 - 12
Publication Date 8/2/2023
ISSN 1041-0236
TypeKeyword Image article
Open Access bronze Bronze Access
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2243047
KeywordsKeyword Image Vaccination Intention (Score: 0.507293) , Vaccine Hesitancy (Score: 0.502896) , Intergroup Contact (Score: 0.502086)