Detailed Record



Jump-landing kinetic asymmetries persisted despite symmetric squat kinetics in collegiate athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction


Abstract The purpose was to determine the differences/correlations in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) loading variables and bilateral asymmetries between injured/uninjured legs and among ascending/descending phases of double-leg squats and jumping/landing phases of countermovement jumps (CMJ) in the collegiate athletes following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Fourteen collegiate athletes performed squats and CMJ 6-14 months following ACLR. The bilateral knee/hip flexion angles, peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) and knee extension moments (KEM), and kinetic asymmetries were calculated. Squats showed the greatest knee/hip flexion angles, while the landing phase of CMJ showed the least (P<0.001). The uninjured leg demonstrated greater VGRF (P≤0.010) and KEM (P≤0.008) than the injured leg in CMJ. Kinetic asymmetries were less than 10% for squats but were greater for the jumping (P≤0.014, 12%-25%) and landing (P≤0.047, 16%-27%) phases of CMJ. Significant correlations were found for KEM asymmetries between phases of CMJ (P=0.050) and squats (P<0.001). Kinetic asymmetries persisted in CMJ, while kinetic symmetries were achieved in squats in collegiate athletes 6-14 months following ACLR. Therefore, the CMJ appears to be a more sensitive assessment to monitor the bilateral kinetic asymmetries compared to squats. It is suggested to assess and screen kinetic asymmetries in different phases and tasks.
Authors Yu Song University of WyomingORCID , Ling Li University of WyomingORCID , Megan A. Jensen University of Wyoming , Boyi Dai University of WyomingORCID
Journal Info Taylor & Francis | Sports Biomechanics , pages: 1 - 14
Publication Date 5/5/2023
ISSN 1476-3141
TypeKeyword Image article
Open Access closed Closed Access
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2207552
KeywordsKeyword Image Athletic Rehabilitation (Score: 0.546287) , Knee Biomechanics (Score: 0.523357) , Muscle Adaptations (Score: 0.502318)