Detailed Record



Constructing A Makeshift Heat Chamber Suitable For Thermoregulatory Research And Heat Acclimation Training


Abstract Environmental chambers (HEC) are crucial for thermoregulation and heat acclimation research, but cost burdens drive the creation of cost-effective makeshift heat chambers (MHC). While MHC’s offer affordability, doubts persist about a MHC's ability to maintain stable TEMP and %RH, potentially confounding physiological responses in human thermoregulation. PURPOSE: Build a MHC to maintain temperature and humidity suitable (±1.1-1.7 °C and ± 2-3 %) for thermoregulatory research and heat acclimation protocols. METHODS: A 10’x10’x8’ PVC frame with plastic sheeting, and 5 heaters and 3 humidifiers, was set to maintain 40 °C and 40% RH. 6 young adults, across BMI categories, underwent 4 exercise protocols (Resting, V̇O2max, Cycling, Heat Tolerance) in the MHC, recording TEMP and %RH every 3 minutes. The V̇O2max, cycling, and heat tolerance protocols were repeated for repeatability analysis. The heat tolerance protocol was performed a third time in a HEC for comparison. Descriptive statistics analyzed deviations from hypothetical means of 40 °C and 40%, while approximate F-tests and 95% confidence intervals assessed COV differences between trials and MHC-HEC. A linear mixed model explored factors (metabolic heat, outside temperature, equipment heat, BMI) affecting the deviation from the hypothetical mean TEMP (40 °C). Correlation analyses investigated links between independent factors and TEMP/%RH variations. RESULTS: Mean TEMP was consistently below the hypothetical 40 °C (39.90 ± 0.32 °C), while %RH was consistently higher than 40% (40.86 ± 0.59). TEMP COV range was 1.56-1.77%, and %RH COV was 4.66-5.62%. Repeated trials showed no differences in TEMP, %RH, and COV (95% CI, TEMP [39.81-39.98], %RH [40.44-41.15]; all p > 0.05). In heat tolerance, MHC displayed different TEMP (39.86-40.03 °C) and %RH (40.63-41.15%) compared to HEC (39.39-39.57 °C; 42.48-43.01%; p < 0.001). However, the MHC was closer to the hypothetical 40 °C and 40% than the HEC. The linear mixed model revealed no significant influence of factors on TEMP variation (All R2 < 0.50; p > 0.05). Correlation analyses showed weak non-significant correlations between independent factors and TEMP/%RH variations (r = -0.16-0.13; all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The constructed MHC, priced under $2,000, is suitable for thermoregulation research at 40 °C and 40% RH.
Authors Kevin C. Miller University of WyomingORCID , Jenna Beckley University of Wyoming , Dillon B. Nye University of WyomingORCID , Bailee R. Smith University of Wyoming , Jimmy G. Bautista University of Wyoming , Timothy J. Robinson University of WyomingORCID , Emily E. Schmitt University of WyomingORCID , Danielle R. Bruns University of WyomingORCID , Zachary J. Schlader ORCID , Christopher Bell ORCID , Evan C. Johnson University of WyomingORCID
Journal Info Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , vol: 56 , iss: 10S , pages: 1045 - 1045
Publication Date 9/16/2024
ISSN 0195-9131
TypeKeyword Image article
Open Access closed Closed Access
DOI https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061752.49831.b8
KeywordsKeyword Image Heat load (Score: 0.46693605)