| Abstract |
Gendered divisions of labor are a feature of every known contemporary hunter-gatherer (forager) society. While gender roles are certainly flexible, and prominent and well-studied cases of female hunting do exist, it is more often men who hunt. A new study (Anderson et al., 2023) surveyed ethnographically known foragers and found that women hunt in 79% of foraging societies, with big-game hunting occurring in 33%. Based on this single type of labor, which is one among dozens performed in foraging societies, the authors question the existence of gendered division of labor altogether. As a diverse group of hunter-gatherer experts, we find that claims that foraging societies lack or have weak gendered divisions of labor are contradicted by empirical evidence. We conducted an in-depth examination of the data and methods of Anderson et al. (2023), finding evidence of sample selection bias and numerous coding errors undermining the paper's conclusions. Anderson et al. (2023) have started a useful dialogue to ameliorate the potential misconception that women never hunt. However, their analysis does not contradict the wide body of empirical evidence for gendered divisions of labor in foraging societies. Furthermore, a myopic focus on hunting diminishes the value of contributions that take different forms and downplays the trade-offs foragers of both sexes routinely face. We caution against ethnographic revisionism that projects Westernized conceptions of labor and its value onto foraging societies. |
| Authors |
Vivek V. Venkataraman  , James C. Hoffman , Karen Farquharson , Helen Elizabeth Davis , Edward H. Hagen , Raymond Hames , Barry S. Hewlett , Luke Glowacki , Haneul Jang , Robert L. Kelly  , Karen L. Kramer , Sheina Lew‐Levy , Kathrine Starkweather , Kristen Syme , Duncan N. E. Stibbard‐Hawkes
|
| Journal Info |
Elsevier BV | Evolution and Human Behavior
|
| Publication Date |
5/1/2024 |
| ISSN |
1090-5138 |
Type |
article |
| Open Access |
closed
|
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.014 |
| Keywords |
Life History Theory (Score: 0.462029)
|
